top of page
Buscar

Week 8

  • 23 feb
  • 3 Min. de lectura

Actualizado: hace 3 días

February 23 - March 01, 2026


Week 8 centered around visual cohesion, material refinement, and lighting balance across all shots. The feedback this week pushed us to move beyond technical fixes and focus more on polish, subtlety, and stronger integration between FX, lighting, and compositing.


Mentors Feedback

This week’s feedback highlighted inconsistencies in lighting balance, particle integration, and material quality.


For Shot 1, the red tone was received positively; however, the ground currently feels less vibrant compared to the upper frame. Mentors suggested increasing color presence on the ground to avoid the top half overpowering the composition. Additionally, motion blur is needed—particularly on the white particles—to enhance realism and reduce the slightly rigid appearance. Questions were also raised about the tube shape of the particles, encouraging further refinement.


In Shot 2, lighting intensity on the left side is too strong and needs to better match the right side for balance.


For Shot 3, several notes focused on integration. The feathering of the matte edge is currently visible and breaking the illusion, requiring either correction in comp or a cleaner render match. The lighting before the particles enter feels flat or “dead,” and adding another subtle light source could improve depth. Color mismatch between particles and the matte was also noted, as they currently feel disconnected.


Regarding Shot 4, mentors noted that the shot feels overly bright and lacks shadow definition in the particles, causing it to resemble a flipbook rather than a cohesive render. Suggestions included implementing a three-point lighting setup, introducing subtle color (leaning toward a cool gray-blue), and increasing particle variation. The wood texture also needs an upres, stronger bump detail, and proper beveled edges to match the quality of the printer. There was also discussion about possibly removing the final painting entirely, as the particle visuals themselves may be more compelling.


Overall, this week’s feedback emphasized consistency in particle behavior, stronger lighting hierarchy, and improving material realism—especially for the wood asset.


Week 8 Work Plan

Based on this feedback, we established the following plan:

Shot 1

  • Scale particles - Yiqi

  • Increase light on ground - Sofia

  • Motion blur layer on messy particles - Yiqi

  • Decrease brightness on particles - Sofia

  • Saturate Colors - Sofia

  • Reflection of particles on floor - Sofia


Shot 2

  • Reduce lighting on BG - Benji

  • Make it longer - Yiqi


Shot 3

  • Laser 1 pass only - Sofia

  • Feather effect on image edge (Could be a match error, could be fix in comp)

  • Scale particles - Riley

  • 1 more light for depth - Benji

  • Depth of field pass

  • Wood object fix bumpiness - Benji

  • Wood object bevel edges - Itim


Shot 4

  • Reduce light - Benji

  • Add color on the ground - Sofia

  • BG color change/backdrop (gray-blue) - Itim/Riley

  • Scale particles - Riley


My Focus This Week

This week, my primary focus was on color correction, depth integration, and overall visual cohesion across the sequence as per dominant feedback on our mentors.


In Shot 1, after reviewing the messy particle variation suggested in previous critiques, we ultimately removed them following our professor’s feedback that the shot felt less polished with that layer included. I concentrated on refining exposure and saturation balance, and I implemented the swirl reflection on the floor to strengthen environmental interaction and add subtle visual complexity without overwhelming the frame.



For Shot 2, I adjusted the particle saturation to better match Shot 1, ensuring color continuity across the sequence and avoiding abrupt tonal shifts between cuts.


BEFORE AFTER


In Shots 3 and 4, my focus shifted toward color grading and depth of field integration. I worked on balancing brightness levels, refining color relationships between particles and matte elements, and implementing depth of field passes to create stronger spatial separation and a more cinematic feel. These adjustments helped improve hierarchy within the frame and support the intended mood.


As a note, for Shot 4 we took out the particles as feedback mentioned that they looked undefined and not as a part of the scene, we decided to focus on the other shots feedback instead to polish as more as possible the overall.


Overall, my work this week centered on refining visual balance—ensuring that color, light, and depth feel intentional and consistent across all shots. This changes has helped me better understand how compositing decisions directly influence perceived quality, and how subtle adjustments in color grading, exposure control, and depth can elevate a shot more effectively than additional simulation passes.



 
 
 

Entradas recientes

Ver todo

Comentarios


bottom of page